nwg

To confirm things a little I susggest this :

ALL 1v1 CB Wiki games count towards the Legaue (unless both are on the same team, like simpson and myself).

ALL 1v1 CB "general" lobby games count towards the Legaue (unless both are on the same team, like simpson and myself).

ALL 2v2 CB "general" games count towards the Legaue (unless both are on the same team, likesimpson and myself).

2v2 WIKI battles DO NOT COUNT,

Reason : Some of these can be very UNbalanced, for example 9k v 15k....and then people would not volunteer to play the side with 9k because if they lose (which is very likely) it will be a lost battle in the League.

Cant this be "unbalanced 2v2 WIKI battles DO NOT COUNT" instead of "2v2 WIKI battles DO NOT COUNT"

I mean
Unbalanced battles: If the differance is more than 1k lets say...?

Yes, could be, lets see what the others think about this.

I am for writing a clean as shorter possible rule. Consequences: no doubt in mind, no discussion.

I will say I prefer the G24's rule.

Cheers, gp.

i really cant understand why 12k v 12k battles or even 12k v 11k battles cant be open for 2v2 ...if the attacker and/or the defender doesnt want it be a 2v2 is okay but why to limit them for a 1v1...

i.e there is a booked battle on Jan 18, 18pm gmt.
GP,France,13.25k V AnkLrd,Russia,10.75k , would GP prefer a 2v2 for that as probably he ll get points for that battle when we make all 2v2 out of league battles?

AnkLrd, my reason is to avoid pharmacist calculations

Hmm ... from french expression "calculs de pharmaciens" meaning extremely precise dosages .

i see your point of view GP.
but just one more thing i want to mention, team mates may prefer to support each other for balanced and/or unbalanced battles.

I mean this:
Gn and Ank will have a battle. Its 12k GB to 9k Russia battle--- or smth like that. Yes course, Dougiej wont want to participate and make it a 2v2 as he plays for Austrai but Although it s unbalanced, Frog may want to support Ank and risk their own points just to rescue Russia. The main idea for this league is the "teams" acc. to me. Napoleon was a great commander but his marshals were with him trying to beat allied coalition

AnkLrd, I will answer frankly with two versions.

Version one, one aims for an osmosis between Wiki and CB.
When Wiki-game are 1 vs 1, The battles are to be 1 vs 1.

Version two, one prefer to win wiki-game with the support of some "big guns" during the battles while himself stay waiting the better moment to begin active.
Knowing another "big gun" for the opponent will have an almost impossible task to compensate his weak opponent who will be aggressed the first.

Friendly yours, pal. I don't lose of view, after all this is only about games. I can easily suit to either version. I just try to foreseen about other players with possibly less detachment.

Pal, I hope (because I fear), I could not be perceived as brutal, I tell to you I am happy to play with you either version is adopted.
Foreign language (even mother language) may be so treacherous! This is the reason as many as I could I sow often emoticons, hoping to redress the sense of my sentences if necessary.

To make it shorter, version one or two is equal for me. After all this is only a game . Confer what happens in the world!!

Your faithfull buddy,
gp.

I now start to think that AnkLrd (and Dougie) are right, I think it should be that ALL games count.....

One thing : say we have player 1 and player 2 both togther for team A and the other side (B) is two players from DIFFERENT teams. If B wins then both teams get a win, team A will have TWO lost games against them.....as long as eveyone understands this there ehould be no problem.

Lets see if Moopere agree's, if so, todays 2v2 battle will be moved back to the CBL topic - and the points awarded to Austria and Britian (Dougie and g24).

My opinion is that all games could (should?) count. If folks are that worried about their CBL team standing then they don't have to put up their hand to play in 2v2 games that are generated from the wiki.

I must admit though, I get awfully confused about country names and playing faction. I play CBL for Prussia, yet I don't use Prussia in any wiki game yet, so what happens if I win a wiki battle as Russia or Spain (my two wiki factions?). I suppose I could change my CBL faction to Russia, but the problem is that the current round of campaigns is more then 50% completed and the next round I might not play as Russia.....arrgghhhh.

M.

If you win a CBL battle with Russia you get either 2,3 or 4pts depending on the florins you started with.

If you win a CBL battle with Spain you get either 2,3 or 4pts depending on the florins you started with PLUS 1.5pts extra for using a minor faction.

If you win a CBL battle with Prussia you get either 2,3 or 4pts depending on the florins you started with PLUS an extra 1 pt for using your own CBL faction.

.............

We seem to more or less agree that ALL CB games will count for the League.....yesterdays battle with count and be done now.

Yep this sounds good to me, all battles count.
Bring on those games fellas, if I'm free i will join whatever the florins you are fighting with.
These CB games are getting better and better, and thanks to Moopere we have a new version to look forward to, with some great arty options becoming available.