nwg

pls check flags attached to battle results chart, http://site.mynet.com/plyr35/napoleonic/id5.htm ... This is like a 2 teams league, british(15 battles out of 18 ) against everyone

From the nbc forum chat:





anyone have any other reasons i couldnt remember ?

The rules are here :

http://ntw2.wikispaces.com/CB_TeamLeague

and yes, it's for fun......but also to make the battles have some meaning, rather than play one off games, that have no real long term meaning.

[CB] Battle 20, Aus-Rus V Brit-Fr

woww, exciting one! thnks all.

http://napbc.freeforums.org/battle-20-dj-ank-v-gn-gp-t466.html

i talk to CeltiberoFrog on nbc forum chat tonight. he decided to join russia.
...and also told him that russia,france and prussia has 1 member each, the other two teams have 2 members. hope that was not forbidden arghh, and i said that if he joins russia, he would have helped me

Great news to hear Frog has arrived on the battlefield, wow, we are going to have to take care now with Frog using the Russian soliders to fight with - he is most dangerous player with Russia.

I will update the wiki page to show Frog with Russia.

I hope Grog will join the poor French team

Battle Field...
I just wonder, nothing much important:

when 4 players enter a battle room for a 2v2, is it possible to make a decision who s front of whom? I mean this, is it possible (or would it be better) to put players with close PR front of each other. Starting from the level PR or hishest PR? is the order of entering battle room makes this decision.player 1(att.) matches with player3(def.), player2(att.) matches with player4(def.)? or a strong player front of a weak player(gn against ank) more enjoyable? or this matching is all a chance (i dont think so ) ?...or we already have a system that i dont know like attackers choosing maps and defenders dont choose french kind of thing?

ps I always ask such questions...about choosing maps , battle field positions, armies so on; please dont think that i am so addicted to points/scoring, no! I just want to have good battles although you all know that i cant even kill 1000 men mostly in a single battle but I just want to sort out things as i am not familiar to RTS games. But i think you already know this.

Its known that the host of the game always starts to the left of either the attacking or defending zone (depending on if he chooses to attack or defend). The next player is right of him and so on and so forth in an anti clockwise direction. So, yes, you can choose to arrange the players against each other as desired.

Its not a bad idea having the two strongest players face each other and the other two also face each other. Of course in a 2v2 battle there is usually considerable intermingling of both players forces, but its perhaps not a bad start.

In the wiki games where we've been lucky enough to have a couple of 2v2 encounters we've so far tried to run with the practise that the two players involved with the wiki should face each other with their two flanking generals (team-mates) also facing each other.

Regards, M.

Intersting subject, I can see the reason for it, for myself I don't think it's vital....in yesterdays battle Dougie was the host so would be on the left and me on the right, what order the "enemy" join in to go on their left and right is (I think) best left to them....GP and M (in yesterdays case) could join as they wanted to set the battle up as they wanted - rather than have it set up by some "rule"....best to have some flexibility I'd say.

Yes, you know, I disagreed with this in the beginning when it was first raised. Seemed more reasonable then that the actual wiki game players involved should face each other....however, 2v2 games are usually a lot more dynamic than simply 'sharing' a battlefield with 2 other folks. I'm more inclined to agree with you Gunner. Let the lobby game fill up and let the chips fall where they may. You can always 'swap' sides at the beginning of a battle if you feel that strongly by simply marching your guys at maximum range from one side of the field to the other hehehe.

M.

I think Ank makes a good point regarding CB 2v2 league games,
It may make for more interesting battles if players of roughly equal PR ratings face each other, you are much more likely for the majority of the game to have a good even contest.

My views on wiki battles i think are well known, for me it feels correct for the two players involved in the wiki game to face each other.
Off course this is not a set rule and has happened as agreed by both players.
But if for example i was attacking Moopere in the wiki and he chose to face off against my opponent, then no harm done its a free choice.

FINAL VIEW:
At Last all changes are made for the final view of the site.http://site.mynet.com/plyr35/napoleonic/

If this is alright for everyone i dont plan to make changes from now on until we all think we have to.

I want to give info on this...
Gunner already updating Average points team tables and player tables here http://ntw2.wikispaces.com/CB_TeamTable after each battle and i copy/paste them to http://site.mynet.com/plyr35/napoleonic/id6.htm with adding a bit color, nothing else + i put a battle results table containing each battle data from nbc forum,CB league results and make sum of kills,losses so that we can calculate best kills/losses ratio player and total battles,victories for each player so we can have best victories/total battles ratio player. If you also think these 2 ratios are important (worth keeping for stars that i add for the realated player) i wont make changes here?

Anything else you want to see on these results table? (i deleted men surviving ratio as we dont just play wiki campaigns but lobby games too and men deploying option seems useless)
so we final have:

* Team Tables (wshowing best average points)
* Hall of Fame (showing best average points)
* Vitories-Battle Results Chart to see best victories/total battles and kills/losses ratios.(for stars on player charts and hall of fame)
* All player charts for each team showing victory nos-medals,merit medals and battle conduct awards.
* News section announcing new medals and new members joining to the league.
?

I heard on Napoleonics forum that LG might be released before Etw! ? wow... I know nations in that game might be different as there probably ll be so many minor factions but our point system http://ntw2.wikispaces.com/CB_TeamLeague seems to be suitable for both CB and LG or any game that we can have MP battles?

regards...

All looks good to me, fine work.......it's an excellent site, lets hope we get more people to join in soon.

Tonight, while talking to gunner i realised smth and gn was right i think. In that CB league we use new pointing system but NBC ranks. So if someone outside this clan joins CBL, which rank he ll use...
So as gn mentioned, that League may be apart from NBC under its umbrella.
We already have medals for victories which are updated means we can easily have "rank" related to these going to players with medals.
like,
1.victory lieutenant
5. Captain
10. Major
25. Lieutenant Colonel
50. Colonel
75. Brigadier
100. Major General
125. Lieutenant general
150. General
200. Field marshal

If you all agree with this i ll update the player charts.
?